IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaiah Saville Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2000-09-21 Country: USA
2019 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #135  ·  Vegas Golden Knights Vegas Golden Knights
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — USHL 34 25 4 92.5% 1.90 4 0.9980 95.2%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2021-22 Nebraska Omaha D1 30 16 14 90.7% 2.52 4
2020-21 Nebraska Omaha D1 24 12 11 90.7% 3.03 1
2019-20 Nebraska Omaha D1 28 10 11 90.7% 2.85 1
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Jan Korec USHL 90.1% 92.5% Boston College 91.8% 1.75
Jacob Fowler USHL 92.1% 95.6% Boston College 92.6% 2.14
Hampton Slukynsky USHL 92.3% 93.3% Western Michigan 92.2% 1.90
Michael Hrabal USHL 90.8% 95.2% UMass 91.2% 2.59
Ben Kraws USHL 89.5% 91.2% Miami 87.1% 4.12
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Brody Haynes NCDC 92.5% 92.3% Elmira D3 94.8% 1.22
Cooper Rautenstrauch NAHL 88.9% 94.0% Colby D3 93.4% 2.08
Cooper Rautenstrauch NCDC 90.6% 93.8% Colby D3 93.4% 2.08
Vaughn Makar NAHL 90.9% 95.6% St. Norbert D3 93.2% 1.73
Brayden Ingram EHL 91.2% 94.4% Assumption D2 91.4% 2.71

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.