IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Lush Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1998-02-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — AJHL 45 23 15 91.9% 2.66 3 0.9700 83.0%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2023-24 RIT D1 4 2 2 91.9% 2.27 0
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 35 14 16 89.9% 2.69 1
2021-22 Sacred Heart D1 4 1 3 92.5% 2.37 —
2020-21 Sacred Heart D1 6 2 3 88.7% 3.29 0
2019-20 Sacred Heart D1 4 1 0 91.5% 2.11 1
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Jacob Zacharewicz NAHL 89.2% 83.4% Brown 86.8% 4.19
Ryan Snowden USHL 89.8% 82.7% Ohio State 90.5% 2.52
Bruno Bruveris USHL 89.7% 82.4% Miami 86.6% 4.15
Daniel Hauser WHL 91.3% 83.7% Wisconsin 90.0% 2.49
Ryan Manzella USHL 90.4% 83.1% Michigan Tech 89.5% 3.17
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Nikolas Trakakis MJHL 87.9% 83.1% Chatham D3 93.4% 2.45
Anthony Bonaldi USPHL-Premier 90.6% 82.7% Nichols D3 81.8% 7.78
Colby Entz SJHL 89.8% 82.9% St. Norbert D3 93.0% 1.88
Blake Bjella USPHL-Premier 91.5% 83.1% Worcester State D3 87.0% 3.54
Jeffrey Dreger MJHL 86.4% 82.1% SUNY Morrisville D3 84.5% 4.37

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.