| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | — | NAHL | 20 | 8 | 10 | 89.1% | 3.72 | 0 | 0.9843 | 87.7% |
| 2019-20 | — | USHL | 9 | 2 | 4 | 86.9% | 3.60 | 0 | 0.9980 | 86.7% |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Stonehill | D1 | 29 | 7 | 19 | 89.7% | 3.24 | 1 |
| 2023-24 | Maine | D1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022-23 | Maine | D1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 86.5% | 3.12 | 0 |
| 2021-22 | Maine | D1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 88.0% | 3.41 | 0 |
| 2020-21 | Maine | D1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.