icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | — | USPHL-Premier | 24 | 13 | 4 | 92.4% | 2.72 | 3 | 0.9400 | 82.6% |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Johnson & Wales | D3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 88.4% | 5.50 | — |
| 2021-22 | Johnson & Wales | D3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Johnson & Wales | D3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Johnson & Wales | D3 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 82.2% | 8.99 | 0 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raythan Robbins | USHL | 88.6% | 82.2% | Bemidji State | 80.0% | 5.38 |
| Aaron Randazzo | USHL | 88.8% | 82.5% | Air Force | 82.4% | 5.23 |
| Chad Veltri | USHL | 90.2% | 83.9% | Niagara | 93.1% | 2.10 |
| Jan Spunar | USHL | 90.7% | 84.1% | North Dakota | 91.9% | 1.91 |
| Alec Calvaruso | USHL | 89.0% | 83.1% | RPI | 86.9% | 3.91 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Owen Swanbon | USPHL-Premier | 90.4% | 83.4% | Framingham State | D3 | 83.3% | 8.53 |
| Liam Gross | USPHL-Premier | 90.2% | 83.4% | Buffalo State | D3 | 85.7% | 5.75 |
| Karl Zodda | NA3HL | 92.0% | 82.6% | Chatham | D3 | 86.8% | 4.66 |
| Jeffrey Reda | USPHL-Premier | 90.6% | 83.7% | Franklin Pierce | D2 | 85.9% | 5.85 |
| Gabe Rosek | NOJHL | 91.3% | 83.7% | Concordia | D3 | 90.2% | 4.56 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.