IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Defazio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2001-07-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2021-22 — OJHL 34 14 16 89.7% 3.36 1 0.9700 78.5%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Neumann D3 8 — — 88.9% 3.43 0
2024-25 Neumann D3 18 9 6 91.7% 2.70 1
2023-24 Neumann D3 19 7 11 89.8% 3.28 0
2022-23 Neumann D3 21 5 13 90.7% 3.57 —
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Quentin Sigurdson USHL 89.6% 78.2% Northeastern 92.0% 2.13
Charlie Schenkel OHL 89.7% 78.8% Robert Morris 90.9% 2.80
Alec Calvaruso USHL 89.0% 77.9% RPI 86.9% 3.91
Patriks Berzins USHL 90.1% 79.5% Maine 90.0% 1.79
Jack Williams USHL 90.8% 79.1% Notre Dame 88.9% 2.90
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Will Pinney NA3HL 90.3% 78.8% Gustavus Adolphus D3 85.8% 4.05
Dane Couture MJHL 86.5% 80.8% Concordia D3 87.3% 2.94
Dylan Boughen USPHL-Premier 90.6% 79.8% Rivier D3 62.5% 14.86
Karl Zodda NA3HL 92.0% 79.9% Chatham D3 86.8% 4.66
Nathan Loisel CCHL 88.3% 79.6% Southern New Hampshire D2 92.5% 2.61

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.