IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Freddy Soderberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2002-06-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2022-23 — USPHL-Premier 17 12 4 93.1% 1.84 3 0.9400 83.6%
2021-22 — USPHL-Premier 25 14 11 91.7% 2.45 6 0.9400 85.5%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Fitchburg State D3 19 — — 93.4% 2.13 —
2024-25 Fitchburg State D3 18 9 7 90.4% 2.95 —
2023-24 Fitchburg State D3 15 9 4 93.0% 2.48 —
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Quentin Sigurdson USHL 89.6% 83.5% Northeastern 92.0% 2.13
Jack Williams USHL 90.8% 84.5% Notre Dame 88.9% 2.90
Ben Bonisteel OJHL 92.6% 84.6% Canisius 89.3% 3.10
Alec Calvaruso USHL 89.0% 83.1% RPI 86.9% 3.91
Chad Veltri USHL 90.2% 83.9% Niagara 93.1% 2.10
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Gabe Rosek NOJHL 91.3% 83.7% Concordia D3 90.2% 4.56
Nathan Loisel CCHL 88.3% 83.8% Southern New Hampshire D2 92.5% 2.61
Liam Gross USPHL-Premier 90.2% 83.4% Buffalo State D3 85.7% 5.75
Dylan Boughen USPHL-Premier 90.6% 83.5% Rivier D3 62.5% 14.86
John Simon NA3HL 92.1% 83.2% Post D2 91.6% 3.15

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.