IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Fellner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2003-03-25 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Regina · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2024-25 Univ. of Regina USports-M 7 0 6 82.7% 5.69 0 1.0100 87.9%
2022-23 — SJHL 32 18 11 89.9% 2.98 2 0.9700 86.0%
2021-22 — SJHL 27 6 17 88.3% 4.73 0 0.9700 87.6%
2021-22 — AJHL 6 4 2 87.7% 3.42 0 0.9700 86.1%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2023-24 Alvernia D3 18 8 9 92.4% 2.68 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Tyler Palmer USports-M 91.5% 98.1% Bowling Green 89.9% 2.35
Matteo Drobac USports-M 90.4% 97.3% Miami 91.3% 2.69
Max Beckford NAHL 94.0% 88.0% Bentley 90.2% 1.84
Jack LaFontaine BCHL 92.3% 85.8% Minnesota 91.9% 2.55
Isak Posch NAHL 92.6% 86.5% St. Cloud State 90.1% 2.93
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Brody Haynes NCDC 92.5% 92.3% Elmira D3 94.8% 1.22
Artur Dzhilavyan EHL 92.3% 87.4% Keene State D3 95.9% 1.48
Joey Lovullo NAHL 91.2% 87.6% Hamilton D3 — —
Avery Sturtz NAHL 90.4% 86.7% Utica D3 84.2% 3.16
Ben Skelton EHL 91.3% 86.6% Keene State D3 92.0% 2.80

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.