icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | — | NAHL | 35 | 12 | 17 | 90.2% | 3.25 | 2 | 0.9843 | 87.8% |
| 2024-25 | Dubuque Fighting Saints | USHL | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.9983 | — |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Skidmore | D3 | 8 | — | — | 92.5% | 2.30 | 1 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kolby Matthews | BCHL | 90.0% | 87.5% | RIT | 93.3% | 1.69 |
| Bryant Marks | NAHL | 89.7% | 87.6% | Alaska Anchorage | 94.1% | 1.33 |
| Francis Boisvert | CCHL | 92.0% | 86.9% | St. Lawrence | 89.7% | 3.50 |
| Ryan Manzella | NAHL | 90.4% | 88.3% | Michigan Tech | 90.6% | 2.48 |
| Hobie Hedquist | BCHL | 91.4% | 88.7% | North Dakota | 90.5% | 2.51 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ford DeLoss | USPHL-Premier | 92.0% | 87.3% | Stevenson | D3 | 50.0% | 3.85 |
| Cal Wilcox | NCDC | 89.6% | 87.9% | Suffolk | D3 | 89.1% | 4.18 |
| Nick Anderson | USPHL-Premier | 92.6% | 87.8% | Nichols | D3 | 87.4% | 4.17 |
| Maxim Zinchenko | USPHL-Premier | 91.8% | 87.0% | Johnson & Wales | D3 | 90.8% | 3.68 |
| Anthony Beaulieu | EHL | 89.2% | 87.7% | New England College | D3 | 93.0% | 2.37 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.