IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Grover Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2004-06-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2024-25 — OJHL 27 16 9 90.4% 3.04 1 0.9700 78.0%
2023-24 — OJHL 15 7 6 90.8% 3.30 0 0.9700 84.7%
2022-23 — OHL 1 0 1 81.8% 3.48 0 1.0008 82.5%
2021-22 — OHL 5 0 2 82.8% 4.59 0 1.0008 88.6%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 St. John Fisher D3 13 — — 91.3% 2.94 1
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Alec Calvaruso USHL 89.0% 77.9% RPI 86.9% 3.91
Quentin Sigurdson USHL 89.6% 78.2% Northeastern 92.0% 2.13
Jack Williams USHL 90.8% 79.1% Notre Dame 88.9% 2.90
Chad Veltri USHL 90.2% 78.3% Niagara 93.1% 2.10
Max Hildebrand WHL 91.8% 79.7% Bemidji State 89.5% 2.71
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Will Pinney NA3HL 90.3% 78.8% Gustavus Adolphus D3 85.8% 4.05
Nathan Loisel CCHL 88.3% 79.6% Southern New Hampshire D2 92.5% 2.61
Gabe Rosek NOJHL 91.3% 79.3% Concordia D3 90.2% 4.56
Liam Gross USPHL-Premier 90.2% 80.0% Buffalo State D3 85.7% 5.75
Dylan Boughen USPHL-Premier 90.6% 79.8% Rivier D3 62.5% 14.86

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.