← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Cadence Liu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-07-01 Country: USA Height: 5'5" (164 cm)
NCAA-W Projection
Harvard
Verbal ECAC-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.43
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.4964
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.92
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG1.0770
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

55%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
45%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 San Diego Angels 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 45 30 13 43 0.956 0.3042 0.3042
2025-26 Fairmont Prep NE-Prep-Girls 13 17 8 25 1.923 0.6246 0.6246
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Nicole Schammel USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG 0.611 Minnesota State
Brooke Avery NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG 0.062 New Hampshire
Jessie Aney USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG 0.267 UConn
Shayna Tomlinson NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG 0.531 Rensselaer
Saana Valkama SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG 0.314 Vermont

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Bella Wagner 2014-15 · 2.24 PPG 0.579 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Madelynn Jablonski 2018-19 · 2.59 PPG 0.500 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Eleanor Donaher 2015-16 · 2.53 PPG 0.524 Lebanon Valley UCHC
Amy Budde 2014-15 · 1.40 PPG 0.923 Lake Forest NCHA
Nicole Unsworth 2016-17 · 1.37 PPG 0.960 SUNY Plattsburgh SUNYAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.