| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Kent | NE-Prep-Girls | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.9200 | — |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Union | D1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 86.6% | 3.25 | 1 |
| 2024-25 | Union | D1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 77.8% | 6.00 | 0 |
| 2023-24 | Union | D1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 92.5% | 2.72 | 0 |
| 2022-23 | Union | D1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 87.0% | 5.05 | 0 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.