icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
No junior season data found for this player.
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | UMass Boston | D3 | 17 | 11 | 5 | 93.0% | 1.81 | 6 |
| 2024-25 | UMass Boston | D3 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 92.9% | 2.46 | 2 |
| 2023-24 | UMass Boston | D3 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 92.0% | 2.32 | 3 |
| 2022-23 | UMass Boston | D3 | 17 | 6 | 8 | 91.8% | 2.56 | 1 |
| 2011-12 | UMass Boston | D3 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 92.0% | 2.87 | 0 |
| 2010-11 | UMass Boston | D3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 94.0% | 2.12 | 0 |
| 2010-11 | Manhattanville | D3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 93.9% | 2.08 | 0 |
| 2009-10 | UMass Boston | D3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 93.2% | 3.21 | 0 |
| 2008-09 | UMass Boston | D3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 88.9% | 4.56 | 0 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.