← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Anika Singh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-01 Country: Unknown
NCAA-W Projection
Brown
Verbal ECAC-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.18
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2039
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.46
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5367
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

18%
NCAA D1W
22%
NCAA D3W
60%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 BB&N NE-Prep-Girls 28 1 1 2 0.070 0.0227 0.0227
2023-24 16U-AAA-W 20 11 8 19 0.950 0.3393 0.3393
2024-25 19U-AAA-W 13 3 2 5 0.385 0.1579 0.1579
2025-26 19U-AAA-W 14 5 3 8 0.571 0.2346 0.2346
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Sara Hjalmarsson SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG 0.657 Providence
Demi Gardner USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.55 PPG 0.250 Minnesota State
Brooklynn Schugel USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG 0.270 Minnesota Duluth
Taylor Wente USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG 0.658 Minnesota
Sydney Brodt USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG 0.600 Minnesota Duluth

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Rylan Kissel 2024-25 · 1.11 PPG 0.577 Bethel MIAC
Jenessa Hernandez 2014-15 · 1.55 PPG UMass Boston MASCAC
Natalie Simons 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.571 Bethel MIAC
Nikki Logergren 2011-12 · 1.24 PPG 0.500 St. Scholastica NCHA
Sierra Hanowski 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG 0.375 St. Scholastica NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.