← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Ava Decourcey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-07-24 Country: Unknown Height: 5'7" (170 cm)
NCAA-W Projection
Yale
Verbal ECAC-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.26
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.3025
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.68
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG0.7962
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

25%
NCAA D1W
12%
NCAA D3W
62%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Tilton NE-Prep-Girls 21 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2024-25 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 30 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2025-26 19U-AAA-W 19 9 5 14 0.737 0.3025 0.3025
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Emily Bergland USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG 0.114 Bemidji State
Lindsay Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG 0.027 UConn
Catherine Skaja USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG 0.342 Minnesota
Rebekah Kolstad USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG 0.057 North Dakota
Sylvia Marolt USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG 0.000 Bemidji State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Elizabeth Tabaka 2013-14 · 1.29 PPG 0.615 Augsburg MIAC
Bella LaMere 2021-22 · 1.79 PPG 0.444 St. Olaf MIAC
Emilee Anderson 2016-17 · 1.65 PPG 0.480 St. Catherine MIAC
Lauren Ballinger 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG 0.556 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Erin Olson 2017-18 · 1.25 PPG 0.640 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.