← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Isabella Freitas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-01-01 Country: Unknown
NCAA-W Projection
Yale
Verbal ECAC-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.36
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.4242
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
1.01
Elite (1.00+)
Base D3e-W PPG1.1775
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

48%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
48%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 Cushing NE-Prep-Girls 33 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2025-26 16U-AAA-W 16 13 6 19 1.188 0.4242 0.4242
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Reagan Haley USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG 0.108 Minnesota Duluth
Lauren Abbenante NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG 0.607 Holy Cross
Haley Mack USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG 0.371 Bemidji State
Dana Rasmussen USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG 0.167 Ohio State
Phoebe Staenz NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG 0.680 Yale

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Chloe Summerfield 2014-15 · 2.36 PPG 0.500 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Celia Midtbo 2022-23 · 1.73 PPG 0.667 Saint Mary's MIAC
Kristin Chivers 2011-12 · 1.36 PPG 0.862 Elmira UCHC
Hailey Herdine 2015-16 · 1.00 PPG 1.185 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Sarah Markey 2009-10 · 1.52 PPG 0.769 Salve Regina NEHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.