← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Grace Riley

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-08-14 Country: Unknown
NCAA-W Projection
UConn
Verbal HEA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.31
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.3290
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.86
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG0.9133
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

38%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
62%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 16U-AAA-W 17 5 5 10 0.588 0.2101 0.2101
2023-24 16U-AAA-W 35 24 16 40 1.143 0.4082 0.4082
2024-25 Exeter NE-Prep-Girls 25 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2025-26 Exeter NE-Prep-Girls 28 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Briana Mastel NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG 0.258 Harvard
Anna Kilponen SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG 0.257 North Dakota
Anna Wright NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG 0.000 Maine
Megan Wolfe USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG 0.725 Minnesota
Paige Haley USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG 0.083 Minnesota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Meredith Boettcher 2022-23 · 1.25 PPG 0.897 Nazareth UCHC
Noelle Hemr 2023-24 · 1.18 PPG 0.964 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Addison Moos 2022-23 · 1.67 PPG 0.680 Concordia MIAC
Celia Midtbo 2022-23 · 1.73 PPG 0.667 Saint Mary's MIAC
Hailey Herdine 2013-14 · 0.96 PPG 1.185 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.