Yale
Set Commitment
NCAA Division I Women's
Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.48
Strong (0.45–0.70)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.5090
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.87
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2
NCAA D3W
Projected PPG — Division Avg
1.21
Elite (1.00+)
Base D3e-W PPG1.4130
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2
D1W / D3W Likelihood
50%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
45%
Club / Other
Based on 40 comparable players
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG
Pre-College Seasons
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | — | 16U-AAA-W | 16 | 11 | 16 | 27 | 1.688 | 0.6028 | 0.6028 |
| 2025-26 | — | 16U-AAA-W | 16 | 14 | 6 | 20 | 1.250 | 0.4465 | 0.4465 |
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow
Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dana Rasmussen | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG | 0.167 | Ohio State |
| Phoebe Staenz | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG | 0.680 | Yale |
| Bridget Carey | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG | 0.357 | Brown |
| Reagan Haley | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG | 0.108 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Haley Mack | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG | 0.371 | Bemidji State |
Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Hansen | 2015-16 · 1.16 PPG | 1.067 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Dani Sibley | 2011-12 · 1.68 PPG | 0.733 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Rilee Winters | 2021-22 · 1.23 PPG | 1.000 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Ashlyn Abrahamson | 2021-22 · 1.35 PPG | 0.923 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Madison Nipper | 2016-17 · 3.42 PPG | 0.360 | New England College | NEHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.