← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Annika Stock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-01 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
Quinnipiac
Verbal ECAC-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.27
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.3154
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.73
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG0.8471
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

30%
NCAA D1W
12%
NCAA D3W
57%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 16U-AAA-W 43 12 11 23 0.535 0.1911 0.1911
2024-25 16U-AAA-W 50 16 25 41 0.820 0.2929 0.2929
2025-26 19U-AAA-W 41 18 15 33 0.805 0.3304 0.3304
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Carly Bullock USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG 0.812 Princeton
Karlie Lund USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG 1.182 Princeton
Catherine Skaja USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG 0.342 Minnesota
Haley Mack USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG 0.371 Bemidji State
Emily Bergland USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG 0.114 Bemidji State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Ari Smith 2011-12 · 2.17 PPG Elmira UCHC
Casey Brown 2010-11 · 2.18 PPG Hamilton NESCAC
Jillian Bilsborough 2023-24 · 1.82 PPG 0.481 Aurora NCHA
Geneva Lloyd 2006-07 · 0.79 PPG 1.107 Amherst NESCAC
Bre Simon 2013-14 · 0.88 PPG 1.000 Hamline MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.