← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Morrison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-01 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
Union
Verbal ECAC-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — ECAC-W
0.18
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2133
Conf. Strength1.010
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.50
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5784
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

12%
NCAA D1W
15%
NCAA D3W
72%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 — 16U-AAA-W 4 0 3 3 0.750 0.2663 0.2663
2025-26 — 19U-AAA-W 30 8 5 13 0.433 0.1779 0.1779
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Gabbie Hughes USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG 1.121 Minnesota Duluth
Laura Anderson USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG 0.290 Yale
Natalie Snodgrass USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG 1.000 UConn
Kaylee Druk USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG 0.000 Syracuse
Tianna Gunderson USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.20 PPG 0.069 Minnesota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Avery Engbrecht 2023-24 · 1.27 PPG 0.370 Wisconsin-Stevens Point WIAC
Kylie Scott 2022-23 · 1.04 PPG 0.440 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Abby Reule 2018-19 · 1.04 PPG 0.450 Concordia MIAC
Lindsey Hays 2016-17 · 1.12 PPG 0.417 St. Catherine MIAC
Emily Lemker 2018-19 · 1.12 PPG 0.417 Saint Benedict MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.