← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Bianca Biagini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-01 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
Arcadia
Verbal MAC D3W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.15
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1722
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — MAC
0.38
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.4704
Conf. Strength1.059
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

5%
NCAA D1W
12%
NCAA D3W
82%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 — 16U-AAA-W 4 1 2 3 0.750 0.2663 0.2663
2025-26 — 19U-AAA-W 30 3 5 8 0.267 0.1095 0.1095
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Kourtney Menches NE-Prep-Girls · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG 0.083 Vermont
Leah Elledge USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.44 PPG 0.032 Lindenwood
Janna Haeg USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG 0.303 St. Cloud State
Kendall Williamson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG 0.000 Colgate
Nicole Rash USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG 0.000 Lindenwood

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Dani Weiland 2024-25 · 0.96 PPG 0.300 Wisconsin-Stevens Point WIAC
Mollie Koch 2024-25 · 0.72 PPG — Saint Mary's MIAC
Charlotte Bellmont 2024-25 · 0.69 PPG — Saint Benedict MIAC
Macy Peterson 2022-23 · 0.93 PPG 0.296 Hamline MIAC
Tallulah Bryant 2022-23 · 1.00 PPG 0.273 Lake Forest NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.