← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Lillian Myers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-01 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.18
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2060
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.48
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5555
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

10%
NCAA D1W
18%
NCAA D3W
72%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 — 16U-AAA-W 5 2 3 5 1.000 0.3551 0.3551
2024-25 — 16U-AAA-W 12 3 4 7 0.583 0.2071 0.2071
2025-26 — 19U-AAA-W 28 2 12 14 0.500 0.2052 0.2052
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Sena Hanson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG 0.630 Brown
Savannah Quandt USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG 0.111 Minnesota
Casey Leveillee NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG 0.265 Vermont
Katie Detert USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG 0.000 St. Cloud State
Sylvia Marolt USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.35 PPG 0.000 Bemidji State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Jenna Allen 2023-24 · 0.93 PPG 0.586 Augsburg MIAC
Mia Montanari 2024-25 · 1.08 PPG 0.500 RPI ECAC
Flora Pasztor 2025-26 · 1.35 PPG — Post NE10
Ellie Newpower 2023-24 · 0.79 PPG 0.679 Hamline MIAC
Taylor Lesnar 2024-25 · 1.50 PPG 0.357 St. Norbert NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.