← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Delaney Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-01 Country: Unknown
NCAA-W Projection
Dartmouth
Verbal ECAC-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.17
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1949
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.46
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5409
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

12%
NCAA D1W
18%
NCAA D3W
70%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2025-26 16U-AAA-W 11 2 4 6 0.545 0.1949 0.1949
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Nicole Guagliardo USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.27 PPG 0.156 Mercyhurst
Sydney Brodt USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG 0.600 Minnesota Duluth
Jackie Pieper USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.32 PPG 0.324 Merrimack
Joie Phelps USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.26 PPG 0.182 Cornell
Natalie Snodgrass USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.33 PPG 1.000 UConn

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Jenna Allen 2023-24 · 0.93 PPG 0.586 Augsburg MIAC
Ellie Newpower 2023-24 · 0.79 PPG 0.679 Hamline MIAC
Taylor Lesnar 2024-25 · 1.50 PPG 0.357 St. Norbert NCHA
Kayla Fuechtmann 2010-11 · 1.04 PPG 0.520 Augsburg MIAC
Mikah Baptiste 2017-18 · 0.81 PPG 0.667 Norwich NEHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.