IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Walsh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-09-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 12 1 0 1 0.083 0.0530 0.0565 0.2496 0.2663
2013-14 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 40 2 4 6 0.150 0.0955 0.0974 0.4495 0.4585
2014-15 — USHL 53 2 9 11 0.207 0.1321 0.1283 0.6218 0.6037
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Yale D1 ECAC SR 28 4 2 6 0.214
2017-18 Yale D1 ECAC JR 31 1 7 8 0.258
2016-17 Yale D1 ECAC SO 18 2 6 8 0.444
2015-16 Yale D1 ECAC FR 27 2 0 2 0.074
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2015-16 · Yale
-32.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11953
Defenseman overall
#1602
Defenseman born in 1995
#3909
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brad Michalchuk
Middlebury · 2000-01
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor May
Adrian · 2018-19
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Nagel
Wisconsin-Stout · 2016-17
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.