IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johnny Meo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-12-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 — NAHL 57 5 30 35 0.614 0.2280 0.2406 0.6501 0.6860
2007-08 Mahoning Valley Phantoms NAHL 57 16 25 41 0.719 0.2671 0.2687 0.7616 0.7662
2008-09 Mahoning Valley Phantoms NAHL 56 11 23 34 0.607 0.2254 0.2156 0.6428 0.6148
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SR 22 8 8 16 0.727
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — JR 29 5 10 15 0.517
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SO 28 7 6 13 0.464
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — FR 28 8 13 21 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2009-10 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+270.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15713
Forward overall
#681
Forward born in 1988
#1187
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Russo
Elmira · 2018-19
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Oye
Fredonia · 2006-07
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Fransky
Elmira · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.