IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Malafronte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-12-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Jersey Jr. Titans EHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1759 0.1892 0.2452 0.2637
2015-16 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 19 1 2 3 0.158 0.0626 0.0639 0.1658 0.1693
2016-17 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 52 15 25 40 0.769 0.3048 0.2946 0.8076 0.7806
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Plattsburgh D1 — JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Plattsburgh D1 — SO 22 3 4 7 0.318
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 22 3 4 7 0.318
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 17 1 3 4 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2017-18 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+35.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17847
Forward overall
#703
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alec Hagaman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2009-10
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Kneeland
Lake Forest · 2003-04
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Rasberg
New England · 2015-16
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.