| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Aberdeen Wings | NAHL | 49 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.163 | 0.0647 | 0.0647 | 0.1714 | 0.1714 |
| 2020-21 | Aberdeen Wings | NAHL | 56 | 1 | 34 | 35 | 0.625 | 0.2476 | 0.2476 | 0.6562 | 0.6562 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | RPI | D1 | ECAC | — | 29 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.172 |
| 2024-25 | Michigan Tech | D1 | CCHA | SR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2023-24 | Michigan Tech | D1 | CCHA | JR | 38 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.184 |
| 2022-23 | Michigan Tech | D1 | CCHA | SO | 16 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.250 |
| 2021-22 | Michigan Tech | D1 | CCHA | FR | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.