Sam Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-05-31 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2019-20	Bay State Bobcats	NA3HL	45	4	22	26	0.578	0.0736	0.0736	0.1828	0.1828
2020-21	Oklahoma City Ice Hawks	NA3HL	40	7	25	32	0.800	0.1019	0.1019	0.2530	0.2530
2021-22	Oklahoma Warriors	NAHL	5	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2022-23	Chatham	D3	UCHC	—	9	0	2	2	0.222

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.09

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.22

2022-23 · Chatham

+147.4% vs. projection

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.