IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler DesRochers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 7 0 2 2 0.286 0.1756 0.1756 0.8417 0.8417
2020-21 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 40 0 2 2 0.050 0.0307 0.0307 0.1473 0.1473
2021-22 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 53 6 27 33 0.623 0.2467 0.2442 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 AHA JR 34 2 6 8 0.235
2024-25 Mercyhurst D1 AHA JR 27 5 3 8 0.296
2023-24 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SO 21 0 2 2 0.095
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2023-24 · Mercyhurst
-60.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5954
Defenseman overall
#1490
Defenseman born in 2003
#2573
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.