IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyrell Mason Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-03-12 Country: Canada
2005 · Round 6, Pick #180  ·  New York Islanders New York Islanders
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 59 7 29 36 0.610 0.2351 0.2503 0.8880 0.9453
2004-05 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 51 6 36 42 0.824 0.3173 0.3230 1.1984 1.2198
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 21 0 1 1 0.048
2007-08 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 37 1 9 10 0.270
2006-07 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 39 1 11 12 0.308
2005-06 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 38 1 5 6 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2005-06 · Clarkson
-43.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3822
Defenseman overall
#641
Defenseman born in 1986
#859
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matias Cleland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jaccob Slavin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Clay Anderson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Ciappa
St. John Fisher · 2023-24
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Bottem
Marian · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bayley Marshall
Aurora · 2015-16
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.