← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Strand Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-04-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Park High USHS-MN 21 1 4 5 0.238 0.0641 0.0677 0.0578 0.0611
2017-18 Minot Minotauros NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 56 5 23 28 0.500 0.1857 0.1837 0.5294 0.5238
2019-20 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 37 7 14 21 0.568 0.2107 0.2107
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 29 1 7 8 0.276
2022-23 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 25 0 7 7 0.280
2021-22 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 29 2 10 12 0.414
2020-21 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5766
Defenseman overall
#997
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.