Tim Washe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-25 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2019-20	—	BCHL	55	10	9	19	0.345	0.1331	0.1331	0.5028	0.5028

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2024-25	Michigan	D1	BigTen	SR	42	16	22	38	0.905
2024-25	Western Michigan	D1	NCHC	—	42	16	22	38	0.905
2023-24	Michigan	D1	BigTen	JR	38	2	10	12	0.316
2023-24	Western Michigan	D1	NCHC	—	38	2	10	12	0.316
2022-23	Michigan	D1	BigTen	SO	39	7	11	18	0.462
2022-23	Western Michigan	D1	NCHC	—	39	7	11	18	0.462
2021-22	Michigan	D1	BigTen	FR	39	2	3	5	0.128
2021-22	Western Michigan	D1	NCHC	—	39	2	3	5	0.128
2020-21	Western Michigan	D1	NCHC	FR	13	1	0	1	0.077

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.11

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.08

2020-21 · Western Michigan

-32.5% vs. projection

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.