IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Beaudry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-10-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 — CCHL 51 3 8 11 0.216 0.0468 0.0488 0.1669 0.1739
2017-18 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 57 3 8 11 0.193 0.0419 0.0415 0.1493 0.1479
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Aurora D1 NCHA SO 16 0 2 2 0.125
2019-20 Aurora D3 NCHA — 16 0 2 2 0.125
2018-19 Aurora D1 NCHA FR 27 1 2 3 0.111
2018-19 Aurora D3 NCHA — 27 1 2 3 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2018-19 · Aurora
+165.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23289
Defenseman overall
#3049
Defenseman born in 1998
#1786
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Garnsey
Arcadia · 2022-23
0.118 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Benji Smieja
Marian · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Ramoundos
Fredonia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.