| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Hamilton Red Wings | OJHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Framingham State | D3 | MASCAC | SR | 22 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 0.682 |
| 2008-09 | Framingham State | D3 | MASCAC | JR | 25 | 8 | 18 | 26 | 1.040 |
| 2007-08 | Framingham State | D3 | MASCAC | SO | 25 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.440 |
| 2004-05 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | FR | 23 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.217 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.