IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Collin McGuire Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-09-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Espanola Paper Kings NOJHL 53 4 5 9 0.170 0.0432 0.0428 0.0705 0.0698
2019-20 Espanola Paper Kings NOJHL 44 2 4 6 0.136 0.0347 0.0347 0.0566 0.0566
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Nichols D3 CNE SR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Nichols D3 CNE JR 21 0 2 2 0.095
2021-22 Nichols D3 CNE SO 22 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Nichols D3 CNE FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28221
Defenseman overall
#3696
Defenseman born in 1999
#1879
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin Trachsel
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Charlie Aus
Concordia · 2010-11
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Todd Koritzinsky
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.