IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Finn Bambery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-10-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0385 0.0413 0.0816 0.0875
2018-19 Connecticut Nighthawks USPHL-Premier 44 5 15 20 0.455 0.0594 0.0595 0.1543 0.1545
2019-20 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 37 8 12 20 0.540 0.1249 0.1249 0.2645 0.2645
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Western New England D3 CNE SR 23 1 3 4 0.174
2022-23 Western New England D3 CNE JR 25 0 3 3 0.120
2021-22 Western New England D3 CNE SO 23 0 4 4 0.174
2020-21 Western New England D3 CNE FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
55%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8779
Defenseman overall
#1773
Defenseman born in 1999
#1123
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Gagnon
Franklin Pierce · 2014-15
0.290 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Caruso
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Hewitt
Aurora · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.