IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Massa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Berwick NE-Prep 20 10 9 19 0.950 0.1882 0.1882 0.4328 0.4328
2022-23 Berwick NE-Prep 27 16 23 39 1.444 0.2861 0.2861 0.6581 0.6581
2023-24 Berwick NE-Prep 21 20 19 39 1.857 0.3679 0.3679 0.8461 0.8461
2024-25 Worcester Jr. Railers NCDC 54 14 15 29 0.537 0.2189 0.2133 0.4316 0.4207
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nichols D3 CNE FR 27 7 6 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2025-26 · Nichols
+104.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8652
Forward overall
#312
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dustin Skinner
Nichols · 2007-08
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Klippenstein
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Thompson
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.767 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.