Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Roseville High | USHS-MN-W | 20 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 1.250 | 0.1888 | 0.1888 |
| 2021-22 | Roseville High | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 1.037 | 0.1566 | 0.1566 |
| 2022-23 | Roseville/Mahtomedi High | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 1.038 | 0.1568 | 0.1538 |
| 2023-24 | Roseville/Mahtomedi High | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 18 | 20 | 38 | 1.462 | 0.2207 | 0.2072 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC | SO | 31 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 0.710 |
| 2024-25 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC | FR | 30 | 8 | 25 | 33 | 1.100 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sena Hanson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG | 0.630 | Brown |
| Savannah Quandt | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG | 0.111 | Minnesota |
| Casey Leveillee | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG | 0.265 | Vermont |
| Sylvia Marolt | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.35 PPG | 0.000 | Bemidji State |
| Mariah Gardner | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG | 0.071 | Minnesota State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alana Laser | 2024-25 · 1.13 PPG | 0.417 | Albertus Magnus | UCHC |
| Ella Konrad | 2023-24 · 0.70 PPG | 0.700 | Nazareth | UCHC |
| Avery Engbrecht | 2022-23 · 1.44 PPG | 0.370 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | WIAC |
| Aubrey Hansen | 2024-25 · 1.20 PPG | — | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Sophie Martin | 2023-24 · 0.77 PPG | 0.667 | Bethel | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.