Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Stillwater High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2021-22 | Stillwater High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.200 | 0.0302 | 0.0302 |
| 2022-23 | Stillwater High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 0.423 | 0.0639 | 0.0572 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Adrian | NCHA | JR | 30 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 0.567 |
| 2024-25 | Adrian | NCHA | SO | 16 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.312 |
| 2023-24 | Adrian | NCHA | FR | 27 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 0.407 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Heise | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.897 | Minnesota |
| Sierra Smith | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Laura Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG | 0.290 | Yale |
| Presley Norby | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG | 0.525 | Wisconsin |
| Rose Rather | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.824 | Holy Cross |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelsi Ries | 2023-24 · 0.89 PPG | 0.158 | Augsburg | MIAC |
| Anika Fortin | 2024-25 · 0.53 PPG | 0.278 | St. Norbert | NCHA |
| Madison McCullough | 2022-23 · 0.32 PPG | — | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
| Samantha Estes | 2013-14 · 0.36 PPG | 0.385 | Connecticut College | NESCAC |
| Merrill Delich | 2023-24 · 0.28 PPG | 0.500 | Saint Benedict | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.