Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Proctor/Hermantown High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.167 | 0.0252 | 0.0252 |
| 2022-23 | Proctor/Hermantown High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 30 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.367 | 0.0554 | 0.0571 |
| 2023-24 | Proctor/Hermantown High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 0.500 | 0.0755 | 0.0746 |
| 2024-25 | Proctor/Hermantown High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 30 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 0.767 | 0.1158 | 0.1100 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Hamline | MIAC | FR | 28 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 0.571 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kourtney Menches | NE-Prep-Girls · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG | 0.083 | Vermont |
| Janna Haeg | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG | 0.303 | St. Cloud State |
| Kendall Williamson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG | 0.000 | Colgate |
| Sofia Poinar | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG | 0.028 | Minnesota State |
| Kippin Keller | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG | 0.056 | Minnesota |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aubree McDonagh | 2022-23 · 0.75 PPG | 0.360 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Lizzy Hamel | 2023-24 · 0.85 PPG | 0.316 | Colby | NESCAC |
| Darby Marshall | 2025-26 · 0.43 PPG | 0.577 | Curry | CNE |
| Annabel Mehta | 2022-23 · 0.42 PPG | 0.654 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Priscilla Orr | 2015-16 · 0.67 PPG | — | Lebanon Valley | UCHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.