← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Abby Bush Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-22 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.19
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2163
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.42
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.4946
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

10%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
90%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Bourget Collège Varsity 19U-AAA-W 47 12 7 19 0.404 0.1287 0.1331
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Wilkes MAC FR 24 8 6 14 0.583

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Lydia Passolt USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG 0.095 Bemidji State
Vilma Tanskanen SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG 0.182 North Dakota
Amanda Bäckebo SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG 0.056 Syracuse
Carly Bullock USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG 0.812 Princeton
Emily Antony USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG 0.444 Minnesota State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Renee Ng 2022-23 · 0.32 PPG 1.042 Wilkes UCHC
Shelby Evans 2022-23 · 0.82 PPG St. Scholastica NCHA
Lizzy Hamel 2022-23 · 0.96 PPG 0.316 Colby NESCAC
Rowyn Ringor 2022-23 · 0.50 PPG 0.667 Post CHA-W
Alexis Oliveira 2023-24 · 0.50 PPG 0.609 Alvernia MAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.