Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Woodbury High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 20 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.200 | 0.0302 | 0.0302 |
| 2021-22 | Visitation School (women) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 48 | 31 | 79 | 3.038 | 0.4588 | 0.4588 |
| 2022-23 | Visitation School (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 29 | 12 | 41 | 1.640 | 0.2476 | 0.2471 |
| 2023-24 | Visitation School (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 12 | 4 | 16 | 0.640 | 0.0966 | 0.0924 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Lake Forest | NCHA | FR | 28 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.500 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Oelkers | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG | 0.257 | Minnesota State |
| Rebecca Lindblad | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.057 | UConn |
| Liz Trautz | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG | 0.094 | Colgate |
| Erin Meyers | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG | 0.897 | Saint Anselm |
| Joie Phelps | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG | 0.182 | Cornell |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellie Newpower | 2022-23 · 0.33 PPG | 0.679 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Harper Poehling | 2023-24 · 0.83 PPG | 0.263 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Jane Eckstrom | 2023-24 · 1.13 PPG | 0.200 | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Malorie Anderson | 2022-23 · 0.56 PPG | — | Concordia | MIAC |
| Molly Ji | 2024-25 · 1.65 PPG | 0.143 | Hamilton | NESCAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.