← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Charlotte Hughes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-09-04 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.11
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1330
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.26
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3018
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

0%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
100%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 56 1 2 3 0.054 0.0192 0.0195
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Southern Maine LittleEast FR 27 7 6 13 0.481

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Stella Haberman USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG 0.125 RIT
Mallory Rushton NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG 0.125 RIT
Sharon Frankel NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG 0.312 Princeton
Olivia Arkell USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG 0.000 Minnesota
Becca Gilmore NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG 1.167 Harvard

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Kellsey Kludt 2022-23 · 0.26 PPG 0.200 St. Olaf MIAC
Skylar MacLean 2023-24 · 0.22 PPG 0.210 St. John Fisher UCHC
Jayne Gamburg 2023-24 · 0.29 PPG 0.182 SUNY Potsdam SUNYAC
Vanessa Stuart 2018-19 · 0.36 PPG 0.160 Suffolk NEHC
Gianna Neist 2023-24 · 0.23 PPG 0.185 Wisconsin-Stevens Point WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.