Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Portsmouth Abbey | NE-Prep-Girls | 23 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.480 | 0.1559 | 0.1559 |
| 2021-22 | Portsmouth Abbey | NE-Prep-Girls | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2022-23 | Portsmouth Abbey | NE-Prep-Girls | 27 | 22 | 26 | 48 | 1.780 | 0.5781 | 0.5781 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Salve Regina | — | JR | 25 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.400 |
| 2024-25 | Salve Regina | NEHC | SO | 27 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 0.519 |
| 2023-24 | Salve Regina | NEHC | FR | 13 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.154 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saana Valkama | SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG | 0.314 | Vermont |
| Nicole Schammel | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG | 0.611 | Minnesota State |
| Kelly Pannek | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG | 1.073 | Minnesota |
| Brooke Avery | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG | 0.062 | New Hampshire |
| Jessie Aney | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG | 0.267 | UConn |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maddie Hulter | 2021-22 · 1.96 PPG | 0.615 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Sydney Simone | 2015-16 · 1.12 PPG | 1.071 | Lake Forest | NCHA |
| Hailey Holland | 2013-14 · 1.17 PPG | 1.036 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Alex Toupal | 2011-12 · 1.84 PPG | 0.652 | Amherst | NESCAC |
| Sydney Bradley | 2018-19 · 1.43 PPG | 0.846 | Alvernia | UCHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.