Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Duluth Marshall School (W) | USHS-MN-W | 19 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 0.842 | 0.1272 | 0.1272 |
| 2021-22 | Duluth Marshall School (W) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 0.708 | 0.1070 | 0.1070 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | SR | 25 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.240 |
| 2024-25 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | JR | 25 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.080 |
| 2023-24 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | SO | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2022-23 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | FR | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leah Elledge | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.44 PPG | 0.032 | Lindenwood |
| Kourtney Menches | NE-Prep-Girls · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG | 0.083 | Vermont |
| Kippin Keller | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG | 0.056 | Minnesota |
| Janna Haeg | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG | 0.303 | St. Cloud State |
| Kendall Williamson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG | 0.000 | Colgate |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allie LeClaire | 2023-24 · 0.79 PPG | 0.333 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Olivia Patnode | 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG | — | Saint Mary's | MIAC |
| Jess Eykyn | 2023-24 · 1.88 PPG | 0.136 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Kate Elbrecht | 2025-26 · 0.66 PPG | — | RPI | ECAC |
| Tallulah Bryant | 2022-23 · 1.00 PPG | 0.273 | Lake Forest | NCHA |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.