← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Insley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.11
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1271
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.29
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3336
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

5%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
90%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Ridley College OWHL-U22 40 8 10 18 0.450 0.1576 0.1576
2024-25 Ridley College OWHL-U22 40 4 6 10 0.250 0.0876 0.0876
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC FR 15 2 2 4 0.267

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Liz Trautz USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.094 Colgate
Sierra Semmel NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG 0.000 Maine
Rebecca Lindblad USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.057 UConn
Madison Oelkers USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG 0.257 Minnesota State
Erin Meyers USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG 0.897 Saint Anselm

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Jana Lesch 2023-24 · 1.44 PPG 0.222 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Abby Reule 2022-23 · 0.69 PPG 0.450 Concordia MIAC
Sam Mugge 2015-16 · 0.80 PPG Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Alyson Vogelsang 2023-24 · 0.81 PPG St. Catherine MIAC
Brooke Klemz 2023-24 · 1.15 PPG 0.280 Hamline MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.