← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Haley Hunter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-23 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.03
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0382
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.08
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.0927
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

0%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
98%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 SAHA U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 28 1 2 3 0.107 0.0245 0.0226
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Lake Forest NCHA FR 28 0 3 3 0.107

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Mallory Rushton NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG 0.125 RIT
Olivia Arkell USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG 0.000 Minnesota
Bailey Knight USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG 0.000 Syracuse
Stella Haberman USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG 0.125 RIT
Megan Berg USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG 0.000 Minnesota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Ava Anick 2022-23 · 0.52 PPG 0.143 St. Norbert NCHA
Kingston Golding 2024-25 · 0.19 PPG — Post NE10
Greta Culshaw Klein 2024-25 · 0.32 PPG 0.240 St. Scholastica NCHA
Piper Miller 2023-24 · 0.34 PPG 0.231 Marian NCHA
Johanna Eidensten 2011-12 · 0.16 PPG 0.429 Elmira UCHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.