← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Haley Hunter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-23 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.03
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0383
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.08
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.0929
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

0%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
98%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 SAHA U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 28 1 2 3 0.107 0.0245 0.0226
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Lake Forest NCHA FR 28 0 3 3 0.107

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Mallory Rushton NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG 0.125 RIT
Olivia Arkell USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG 0.000 Minnesota
Stella Haberman USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG 0.125 RIT
Megan Berg USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG 0.000 Minnesota
Sharon Frankel NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG 0.312 Princeton

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Ava Anick 2022-23 · 0.52 PPG 0.143 St. Norbert NCHA
Greta Culshaw Klein 2024-25 · 0.32 PPG 0.240 St. Scholastica NCHA
Piper Miller 2023-24 · 0.34 PPG 0.231 Marian NCHA
Johanna Eidensten 2011-12 · 0.16 PPG 0.429 Elmira UCHC
Addison Mach 2022-23 · 0.19 PPG Curry NEHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.