← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Jade Meier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.37
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.4357
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.85
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG0.9895
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2012-13 Arctic Bears USHS-W 24 5 8 13 0.542 0.0460 0.0460
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2019-20 Endicott NEHC SR 27 13 26 39 1.444
2018-19 Endicott NEHC JR 28 4 10 14 0.500
2017-18 Endicott NEHC SO 27 11 15 26 0.963
2016-17 Endicott NEHC FR 27 9 11 20 0.741

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Presley Norby USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG 0.525 Wisconsin
Laura Anderson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG 0.290 Yale
Taylor Heise USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG 0.897 Minnesota
Katie McMillan USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG 0.314 Penn State
Lucy Burton USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG 0.000 Yale

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Amanda Smythe 2024-25 · 1.16 PPG 0.105 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Kaitlin Roberts 2023-24 · 0.31 PPG — Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Kellsey Kludt 2024-25 · 0.68 PPG 0.200 St. Olaf MIAC
Madison McCullough 2022-23 · 0.32 PPG — Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Karin Knapp 2015-16 · 0.29 PPG — Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.