← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Michaela O'Connor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.38
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.4478
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.81
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG0.9515
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2015-16 Winsor NE-Prep-Girls 11 20 3 23 2.090 0.6788 0.6788
2016-17 Winsor NE-Prep-Girls 8 21 13 34 4.250 1.3804 1.3804
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2019-20 Williams NESCAC JR 22 2 7 9 0.409
2018-19 Williams NESCAC SO 27 4 4 8 0.296
2017-18 Williams NESCAC FR 6 1 1 2 0.333

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Michelle Löwenhielm SDHL · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.216 Minnesota Duluth

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Nicole Unsworth 2015-16 · 2.95 PPG 0.960 SUNY Plattsburgh SUNYAC
Carly Moran 2013-14 · 2.70 PPG 1.097 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Molly Garin 2017-18 · 2.20 PPG 1.267 Hamline MIAC
Nicole Guagliardo 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG 1.179 Adrian NCHA
Callie Hoff 2016-17 · 2.07 PPG 1.321 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.