Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | South St. Paul High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.080 | 0.0121 | 0.0121 |
| 2015-16 | South St. Paul High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 1.040 | 0.1570 | 0.1570 |
| 2016-17 | South St. Paul High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 0.840 | 0.1268 | 0.1268 |
| 2017-18 | South St. Paul High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 26 | 16 | 42 | 1.615 | 0.2439 | 0.2439 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Hamline | MIAC | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sophia Kunin | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.62 PPG | 0.425 | Wisconsin |
| Brooke Madsen | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG | 0.600 | Penn State |
| Lydia Passolt | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG | 0.095 | Bemidji State |
| Taylor Williamson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG | 0.395 | Minnesota |
| Emily Gunderson | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.64 PPG | 0.171 | Lindenwood |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emily Heid | 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG | 0.593 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
| Abigail Chamernick | 2022-23 · 1.17 PPG | 0.500 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Grace Karakas | 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG | 0.417 | SUNY Cortland | SUNYAC |
| Amanda Broman | 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG | 0.500 | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Kelly Seymour | 2010-11 · 1.48 PPG | — | Saint Mary's (MN) | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.