Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Westminster | NE-Prep-Girls | 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.060 | 0.0195 | 0.0195 |
| 2018-19 | Westminster | NE-Prep-Girls | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Quinnipiac | ECAC-W | FR | 21 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.095 |
| 2023-24 | Colby | NESCAC | SR | 26 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 1.077 |
| 2022-23 | Colby | NESCAC | JR | 26 | 18 | 15 | 33 | 1.269 |
| 2021-22 | Colby | NESCAC | SO | 22 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 1.045 |
| 2020-21 | Colby | NESCAC | FR | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stella Haberman | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG | 0.125 | RIT |
| Mallory Rushton | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG | 0.125 | RIT |
| Sharon Frankel | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG | 0.312 | Princeton |
| Olivia Arkell | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Becca Gilmore | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG | 1.167 | Harvard |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hannah Graunke | 2022-23 · 0.23 PPG | 0.179 | St. Norbert | NCHA |
| Leah Elledge | 2012-13 · 1.44 PPG | 0.032 | Lindenwood | CHA-W |
| Talia Stein Trujillo | 2024-25 · 0.29 PPG | 0.167 | Suffolk | CNE |
| Kristi Bailliff | 2024-25 · 0.36 PPG | 0.115 | Bethel | MIAC |
| Molly Hentges | 2023-24 · 0.93 PPG | 0.043 | Concordia | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.